Already started to appear on the roads, I saw a few, and ladies were driving everywhere. I wonder why.
Went to the dealer to watch a newbie, clambered everything.
I got the impression that this is essentially the same (yes, high-quality, reliable, convenient, universal, etc.), but the same is my RAV 2017, only in a different, more beautiful and harmonious shell.
The engine and chassis are almost the same (a little more powerful, there is a version with ok modes in the transmission, but isn’t this marketing? Why do I need a washer with modes in the city? Oh yes, I forgot, it’s not made for the city, only that most off-road, will I go on Rafik?).
A box, yes, a box is better if it is an automatic, not a CVT (no need to shake when approaching a mileage of 100 thousand).
The salon is the same size (+3 cm did not notice), of course it is more convenient, fresh, well, just new, yes. True, the GU is smaller than mine diagonally, and there is no android, which is strange = for me it is much worse (traffic jams).
The body, yes, is new, the clearance is three millimeters more (this is for 2.5 liters, because 2.0 has even 2 mm less), well, ok, almost the same.
Trunk — volume is almost the same.
LED headlights + lights — the same.
The wheels are the same p18, but in this body they look small, you already need more (19-20), which means the wheels with tires are much more expensive (much).
Heating the entire area of the windshield is a question here, I missed this moment, I also have a very useful thing.
So, what we have as a result is a little more powerful, all-round cameras are available, a little more wheel, a washer of transmission modes (play and forget), a few millimeters of ground clearance.
For this, in a comparable configuration (having handed over my trade-in), I need to pay about 1 million rubles. Isn't it too much? Or have I missed something?
Apparently, it is necessary to travel, be sure to write the result of a test drive in bortovik.
Category: test Drive
Adequately written, I think so too
tested the new RAV-4, 2.0. Noise as it was and is not on the new ...
Why do you need to shake on the variator by 10,000 mileage?
In the photo there is a bomb, as in the photo from the Japan Car of the Year award, but we don’t have one like that ... And the fact that he is the same, I do not agree - he is different, very
Maybe nothing has changed for the author, but why did the RAV-4/5 become the car of the year in Japan, before that the RAV had never been awarded this award.
Water is poured)
The key to this reviewer :) Trade in your own and pay extra 1 million rubles! That is, it would be 300 thousand and it would be normal! The main idea of the post... :) I don’t want to offend ... but if it weren’t for a million from above ... the author would have handed over his car and would have written about a new cool rabbi! And how much better is it than the old one... How about a million? So it seems that the old norms are still :))) No offense current :))
The monitor on the torpedo looks miserable. Ruins the entire interior.
a couple of millimeters of clearance, and overhangs are larger, and as a result, the cross-country ability is worse))) there is no android, this is a fat minus, a new internal combustion engine, and who knows its resource, like the variator? that's why I took a new old rav4, with a discount difference of 340,000 rubles.
There is a new one, but one thing is embarrassing, in the 40th body there is a Japanese assembly, but in the 50th?